The best AI document classification software in 2026: 14 tools for sorting and splitting documents
For operations teams that receive mixed files, and the engineers who build their pipelines. How 14 tools split and label documents, how each one learns a new document type, and what classification costs per page.

Key takeaways
- Document classification software splits a mixed file into its documents and labels each one by type, such as bank statement or W-2. Then it sends each document to the right extraction model, queue or person.
- The 14 tools here fall into five groups. Intelligent document processing (IDP) platforms are Docsumo, ABBYY Vantage, Hyperscience, Tungsten TotalAgility and UiPath IXP. Capture and content platforms, which take in and store scanned documents, are Doxis, Grooper and ParaScript. Rossum is accounts payable (AP) software. The cloud classifiers come from Google, Microsoft and AWS. Reducto and LlamaParse are LLM document APIs that developers call from their own code.
- Tools learn a new document type from rules, from labeled samples or from a short description that a language model reads. Docsumo, Google, Microsoft, AWS, UiPath and Grooper now offer this route too, alongside Reducto and LlamaParse.
- Where prices are published, classification alone is cheap, from $1.25 per 1,000 pages in LlamaParse's fast mode to $15 for Reducto's Deep Classify. The time people spend fixing misfiled documents can cost more than the classifier.
- Score a pilot on your own mixed files. Count splits and labels per document type, and watch what each tool does with a page that fits no type.
On this page
- Document classification software compared
- What document classification software does
- How tools learn your document types
- The 14 best document classification tools
- What classification costs per page
- How to test a classifier on your own files
- Classification for lending, insurance and healthcare files
- Classify only, or classify and extract?
- Frequently asked questions
Document classification software works out what type each incoming document is, such as a bank statement or a claim form. It also splits files that hold several documents. Then each document goes to the right extraction model, queue or person. The right tool depends on who will run it. Most operations teams want one tool that sorts and reads each document. Docsumo, ABBYY Vantage and Hyperscience do both. Engineers can build on a cloud classifier from Google, Microsoft or AWS. They can also use an API such as Reducto.
We compared 14 tools. Every fact comes from the vendor's own website or documentation, checked on September 29, 2026, and the links are in the sources at the end. We checked the facts in the industry section on October 21, 2026. We didn't test the 14 tools against each other, so the testing section explains how to run your own test.
Which team are you?
Document classification software compared
The table shows how each tool splits files, learns a type and handles uncertain documents. It follows each vendor's own site, checked September 29, 2026. Each tool's full entry, with what to watch for, comes further down.
| Tool | Splits | Learns from | Review | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDP platforms5 tools | ||||
| DocsumoOur productLoan, claim and patient files | Yes | Type names you choose, with no training set | Unclassified pile; your reviewers | Free trial; priced on request |
| ABBYY VantageMany document types, on-premises or cloud | Yes | Pre-trained classifier (70+ types) or a few samples per type | Unknown type; manual review | Not published |
| HyperscienceLarge enterprises and government | Yes | Layouts; 10+ pages per layout | Classification tasks for people | Not published |
| Tungsten TotalAgilityCapture plus process automation | Yes | Samples and rules; LLM Copilot | Review and validation steps | Not published |
| UiPath IXPTeams on UiPath | Yes (preview) | Pre-trained types, 5+ samples or descriptions | Unknown type; built-in validation | Priced on request; 0.2 AI units a page |
| Capture and content platforms3 tools | ||||
| Doxis AI.dpDoxis content platform users | Page ranges you set | 50+ types; a handful of samples | Confidence thresholds | Not published |
| GrooperHard paper, on-premises | Yes | Samples, rules, visual or descriptions | Operator flags on low confidence | Not published |
| ParaScriptHandwriting-heavy paper | Yes | Samples plus rules | Validation workflows | Not published |
| AP software1 tool | ||||
| RossumAP teams on Coupa | Yes (suggestions) | Built-in invoice types | Validation screen | From $18,000 a year |
| Cloud classifiers3 tools | ||||
| Google Document AIEngineering teams on Google Cloud | Yes | Descriptions or 10+ samples per label | Build your own | $5 per 1,000 pages |
| Azure Document IntelligenceEngineering teams on Azure | Yes | 5+ samples per type, or descriptions | Build your own | $3 per 1,000 pages |
| Amazon Textract and BedrockEngineering teams on AWS | Yes | Mortgage types, or blueprint descriptions | Build your own | $70 per 1,000 pages (Lending) |
| LLM document APIs2 tools | ||||
| ReductoAPI-first teams | Yes | Category descriptions | Build your own | $7.50 per 1,000 pages |
| LlamaParseAI app and agent builders | Yes (beta) | Type descriptions | Build your own | $1.25 per 1,000 pages |
Side-by-side pages with Docsumo are on our compare hub, including Google Document AI, Azure Document Intelligence, Grooper and Reducto.
What document classification software does
Document classification is the first step in document processing. A file arrives by email, upload, scanner or API, often as one PDF holding several documents. The software finds where each document starts and ends, and decides what each one is. Then it hands each document to an extraction model for that type, a work queue, or a person when it isn't sure.
- Loan files
- Claim submissions
- Scanned mail
- Email attachments
- 01Split into documents
- 02Label each type
- 03Extract its fields
- 04Hold unsure ones for review
Splitting and labeling are separate skills, and tools differ on both. Take a loan file scanned as one 60-page PDF. It has to be cut at the right pages before anything can be labeled. If the tool cuts in the wrong place, the last page of a pay stub becomes part of the bank statement after it.
One naming note before the list. Security and records teams also use the word "classification" for labels such as public or confidential. Those labels decide who can open a file and how long it's kept. That's a different kind of software, and it isn't covered here.
How tools learn your document types
Rules are the oldest method. A page with a form's title or a known header gets that form's label. Anything else goes to a person. Rules are cheap to run and easy to explain. But they break quietly when a layout changes or a new form arrives. So most tools now offer rules as an extra layer on top of a model.
Most platforms and the older cloud classifiers learn from labeled examples instead. Azure's custom classifier needs at least two document types, which Azure calls classes, and five samples of each. UiPath's trained classifier has the same minimum, but UiPath recommends 150 documents per type. Hyperscience wants at least 10 pages per layout, with 120 recommended. Accuracy on your own layouts is usually good, but every new type means collecting and labeling more samples, then training again.
The newest classifiers use a large language model (LLM) that reads each type's name and a short description. So adding a type can mean writing one sentence instead of labeling a folder of samples. Reducto and LlamaParse work only this way. Google's classifier runs on its Gemini AI models. It works from just your label names and descriptions, or after fine-tuning, which means extra training on your own samples. Microsoft's Content Understanding takes up to 200 described categories. AWS's Bedrock Data Automation matches documents to blueprints, which are AWS's name for document types you describe. UiPath and Grooper have added the same option to their older methods, and Tungsten has added an LLM-based classification copilot. Docsumo sorts files into the document types you name, with no training set. Its AI Split takes a plain-English definition of each type.
Description-based classifiers are quick to set up. Their weak point is look-alike document types, which they don't always label the same way. Put look-alike types in your pilot. Whatever the method, ask what the tool does when it isn't sure. Most tools give each label a confidence score, which says how sure the tool is. Ask what happens to a page when that score falls below the level you set. Reducto always returns its best match and advises adding an "other" category, and Microsoft gives the same advice for Azure. Docsumo holds documents it can't classify as Unclassified until a person assigns them. A classifier that files every page under its best guess makes mistakes nobody sees until later. A classifier that holds uncertain pages for a person makes mistakes you can count.
The 14 best document classification tools
Docsumo is our product, so we've put it first and said plainly what it doesn't do. The others are grouped by what they're built for.
IDP platforms
1. Docsumo
IDP platformOur product- Splits
- Mixed files arriving by email, upload or API. AI Split takes a plain-English definition of each document type, for packets such as loan binders and claim packets. Auto-classification and splitting are on the Business plan
- Learns types
- Name the document types you want, and it sorts files into them with no training set. It covers 250+ document types
- Accuracy
- 99% classification accuracy. Test it on your own files, as with any vendor's figure
- Review
- Documents it can't classify wait as Unclassified for a person to assign, and a reviewer can move any document to another type. Fields it's unsure about go to your own reviewers, with thresholds set per field
- Output
- Works with Encompass, Guidewire, NetSuite and any other system with an API, through the API and webhooks. Cross-document checks, case management and automated workflows are on the Enterprise plan
- Custom steps
- You can add a workflow step that calls an LLM or runs your own Python code, for checks and calculations the built-in models don't cover
- Pricing
- A free 14-day trial for up to 1,000 pages; Business and Enterprise plans are priced on request
- Watch for
- It runs in the cloud only, with no on-premises option. Auto-classification and splitting come with the Business plan
- 99%classification accuracy
- 99%field-level accuracy across 250+ document types
- 95%+of documents processed straight through, without manual review
- <5 minper document, down from 2+ hours
2. ABBYY Vantage
IDP platform- Splits
- Yes, by page classification, or with splitter skills for invoices, purchase orders and brokerage statements
- Learns types
- A pre-trained Vantage Classifier covers 70+ types, from ACORD and tax forms to bank statements. A trainable skill needs a few examples per type, or 100 to 1,000 when there are many types or they differ only slightly
- Review
- Documents outside its list are labeled Unknown. A review step can send people only the documents with an unknown type, uncertain fields or rule errors
- Pricing
- Not published; trial on request
- Watch for
- Many document types, or types that differ only slightly, can need 100 to 1,000 training examples per type
3. Hyperscience
IDP platform- Splits
- Yes, with a rule per layout, either a fixed page count or a text pattern on the first page, the last page or across pages
- Learns types
- Fixed forms are matched by layout; semi-structured documents train a model on at least 10 pages per layout, with 120 recommended
- Review
- Low-confidence pages go to a person in a classification task, or are marked No Layout Found
- Pricing
- Not published; volume-based
- Watch for
- Splitting runs on a rule you set for each layout, and each semi-structured layout needs its own training pages
4. Tungsten TotalAgility
IDP platform- Splits
- Yes. Trainable Document Separation learns from correctly separated samples
- Learns types
- Sample documents per type, optionally with rules; a clustering tool groups unknown documents into candidate types
- Review
- Document review and validation steps in the workflow, and Copilot confidence scores (new in 2026.3) that let high-confidence results pass on their own
- Pricing
- Not published
- Watch for
- The LLM-based Copilot for Classification is new in version 2026.1, so check which release you would run
5. UiPath IXP
Automation suite- Splits
- Yes, with a trainable splitter that finds where each document starts and ends in a packet and labels each part. It's a preview release, for customers whose UiPath cloud is hosted in the US or Europe
- Learns types
- Pre-trained types, from W-2s and ACORD forms to CMS-1500s. A trained classifier needs at least 5 documents per type. A generative classifier reads a name and description for each type
- Review
- Unrecognized documents come back as Unknown, and validation by a person is built in
- Pricing
- Community is free, and Basic starts at $25 a month. Classification comes with the Standard and Enterprise plans, which are priced on request. On the Flex plan, classification uses 0.2 of UiPath's AI units a page. Standard has a 60-day trial
- Watch for
- The trainable splitter is in preview, open only to UiPath clouds hosted in the US or Europe
Capture and content platforms
6. Doxis AI.dp (formerly Klippa DocHorizon)
Capture and content- Splits
- By page ranges you set; automatic boundary detection isn't described
- Learns types
- 50+ document types are ready to use, and custom types train from a few examples
- Review
- Confidence thresholds per workflow, with documents below them held for a person
- Pricing
- Not published; priced on request, by volume and use case
- Watch for
- You set the page ranges for splitting, since its docs don't describe finding where each document ends on its own
7. Grooper
Capture and content- Splits
- Yes. ESP Auto Separation classifies and separates in one pass, and an LLM-based AI Separate needs no training
- Learns types
- Trained examples, rules or visual matching, while the LLM Classifier needs only each type's name and description
- Review
- Confidence scores, with low-confidence documents flagged for an operator
- Pricing
- Not published; licensed by page volume
- Watch for
- The LLM Classifier and AI Separate need an LLM connection that you set up, through OpenAI, Azure or a model you host
8. ParaScript
Capture and content- Splits
- Yes, without separator pages or barcodes; version 8.0 added deep-learning separation that can split two documents on one page
- Learns types
- Examples of your documents (no count stated), with optional rules; Auto-Discovery clusters unknown documents into groups you then name
- Review
- FormXtra.AI Capture has validation workflows at the document or field level, including double-blind checks; confidence scores aren't described
- Pricing
- Not published
- Watch for
- The newest FormXtra.AI release announced on its site is version 8.4, from January 2023, so ask what has shipped since
AP software
9. Rossum
AP software- Splits
- Yes. It suggests splits in bundled files for a person to confirm, and QR-code separator pages split files at scan time
- Learns types
- A built-in document type field with six values, from tax invoice and credit note to receipt and other. A sorting extension routes each type to its own queue
- Review
- Split suggestions and uncertain fields are checked on a validation screen
- Pricing
- Starter from $18,000 a year; higher plans priced on request; 14-day trial
- Watch for
- Split suggestions cover the first 32 pages of a file by default
Cloud classifiers
10. Google Document AI
Cloud classifier- Splits
- Yes. The splitter returns page ranges and a type for each document, and you cut the file with Google's SDK
- Learns types
- Label names and descriptions with no training, a fine-tuned model, or a trained model. For training, Google recommends at least 10 documents per label
- Review
- Confidence scores, and a catch-all type for documents that fit no other. Google deprecated its human-review feature in January 2024, so you build the review step yourself
- Pricing
- $5 per 1,000 pages for the first million pages a month, then $3, for the classifier or the splitter. Google lists $0.05 an hour for hosting a custom processor
- Watch for
- The older lending and procurement splitters were discontinued on June 30, 2026, and the processor list gives English as the language
11. Azure Document Intelligence
Cloud classifier- Splits
- Yes, once you set the split mode to auto, since the v4.0 default is none
- Learns types
- A trained classifier with at least two classes and five samples of each, or up to 200 described categories in Content Understanding
- Review
- A confidence score per result; Microsoft suggests a threshold or an "other" type, and no review screen is included
- Pricing
- Custom classification $3 per 1,000 pages (East US); 500 free pages a month on the free tier
- Watch for
- Splitting is off by default in v4.0, and there's no review screen, so your team builds one
12. Amazon Textract and Bedrock Data Automation
Cloud classifier- Splits
- Yes in Analyze Lending and in Bedrock Data Automation projects; Comprehend doesn't split
- Learns types
- Analyze Lending's fixed list of mortgage document types, up to 40 described blueprints per Bedrock project, or labeled training data in Comprehend
- Review
- Confidence scores; AWS's human review service, A2I, no longer takes new customers
- Pricing
- Analyze Lending $0.07 a page for the first million pages a month (US West, Oregon); Bedrock custom output from $0.040 a page
- Watch for
- Analyze Lending covers mortgage document types only, and A2I no longer takes new customers, so you build the review step
LLM document APIs
13. Reducto
LLM document API- Splits
- Yes. Split returns the page ranges for each section you describe, and Deep Split handles harder files
- Learns types
- Categories written as plain-language criteria, with no training; Classify reads the first five pages by default
- Review
- A confidence score and reasoning per category; it always returns a best match, so Reducto advises adding an "other" category
- Pricing
- Classify $7.50 and Split $20 per 1,000 pages, with $150 in free credits; Growth and Enterprise priced on request
- Watch for
- Classify reads the first five pages by default and always returns a best match, so add an "other" category
14. LlamaParse
LLM document API- Splits
- Yes. The Split API, in beta, finds where each document ends and labels each segment
- Learns types
- A type name plus a plain-language description, with no training
- Review
- A type, a confidence score and step-by-step reasoning for each file
- Pricing
- Classify 1 credit a page (2 in multimodal mode) and Split 4, at $1.25 per 1,000 credits; a free plan includes 10,000 credits a month
- Watch for
- The Split API is in beta, and results come back through the API, so plan your own review step
What classification costs per page
Where vendors publish prices, classification alone is the cheap part. Per 1,000 pages, LlamaParse's Classify costs $1.25 in its fast mode, and Azure's custom classifier costs $3. Google's classifier or splitter costs $5 for the first million pages a month. Reducto's Classify costs $7.50, or $15 for its Deep Classify. Services that classify and extract in one step cost more, such as AWS's Analyze Lending at $0.07 a page, or $70 per 1,000 pages. Most platforms, Docsumo included, price their plans on request instead, and Rossum's Starter plan begins at $18,000 a year.
The per-page price rarely decides the budget. A misfiled or badly split document costs a person minutes to find and fix. Those minutes are worth far more than a fraction of a cent. Put your own volumes into the calculator, with the tool's price per page and the share of documents your team still touches.
Cost per document: the classifier plus review time
Per-page prices look small until you add the time people spend fixing what the tool gets wrong.
- Tool cost per month
- Review time per month
- Total per month
- Total cost per document
How it's worked out
- Tool cost = documents × pages × price per page.
- Review time = documents × the share reviewed × minutes per review ÷ 60 × hourly cost.
- Compare tools on the total per document, not the price per page: a cheaper tool that sends more documents to review can cost more.
How to test a classifier on your own files
- Pull a real month of filesTake whole packets as they arrived, not hand-picked single documents, and keep the rare types and the pages that fit no type.
- Write the answer key firstMark where each document starts and what it is before any tool sees the files, so every vendor is scored against the same truth.
- Score splitting and labeling apartCount wrong page boundaries separately from wrong labels, because one bad cut can spoil two documents.
- Read accuracy per typeAn overall average can hide a type the tool keeps confusing with its look-alike, such as a bank statement and a printed transaction history.
- Check what happens below the thresholdSee whether uncertain documents go to a person with a reason, or get filed under the tool's best guess.
- Add one new type during the pilotCount the samples, rules or descriptions it took, and how long before the tool labeled it reliably.
Our take. Buy the classifier that admits doubt. In a pilot, a tool that files every page somewhere looks better on day one than one that sets aside the pages it can't place. But a misfiled pay stub comes back weeks later as a wrong income figure, while a page set aside costs a reviewer a few seconds. We'd rather see a short pile of exceptions, each with the reason it was held, than trust a queue that is quietly wrong.
Classification for lending, insurance and healthcare files
Each industry sends a different mix of documents, so the best fit changes with the file. Below are the tools from this list that fit lending, financial compliance, insurance and healthcare work, with the reason for each. Each fact comes from the vendor's own site, checked on October 21, 2026.
Lending and financial services files
Lenders work on the whole loan file, not one document at a time. One borrower upload can hold bank statements, pay stubs, W-2s, tax returns and an ID. The classifier decides which checks run on which pages, so a wrong label can become a wrong income figure later.
When you test a tool, include pages that look alike. A bank statement looks like a printed transaction history, and one kind of 1099 looks much like another. A tax packet mixes the 1040 with its schedules. A 12-page statement also has to stay one document, even when its pages arrive out of order.
Lenders that want one platform for the whole file can start with Docsumo. It classifies documents with 99% accuracy. Its lending platform splits the file and reads each document. AI Split takes a plain-English definition of each document type, for packets such as loan application binders. Splitting and classification come with the Business plan. Docsumo sorts tax packets by form. When a statement's transaction table runs over several pages, Docsumo joins it into one table. On the Enterprise plan, Docsumo also checks the documents against each other.
Docsumo works with Encompass, MeridianLink and nCino, and with ERPs such as NetSuite and SAP, through the API and webhooks. Any other system with an API connects the same way. On the Enterprise plan, a workflow step called External API can also post the data to the other system. Docsumo runs in the cloud only.
Ocrolus isn't one of the 14 tools here, but it's built for lenders. Ocrolus says it handles more than 2,100 document types. Its Classify step splits mixed PDFs into separate forms and marks pages it doesn't support as UNKNOWN. Inside Encompass, Ocrolus offers its own screen, called a custom form. Ocrolus's documentation also covers a MeridianLink Mortgage integration. Ocrolus's own staff resolve unusual or unclear cases. Docsumo sends those cases to your team instead. We compare the two in Docsumo vs Ocrolus.
Banks that must keep customer files on their own servers can look at ABBYY Vantage, Hyperscience or Tungsten TotalAgility, which all run on-premises. ABBYY's pre-trained classifier covers more than 70 types, from bank statements and pay stubs to loan applications and IRS forms. It labels anything else Unknown. Hyperscience lists loan applications, mortgage applications and KYC forms among its financial documents.
Banks that already store files in Doxis can use Doxis AI.dp. Doxis says it classifies and routes documents from application intake to loan closing. Grooper also runs on-premises and handles difficult paper such as auto loan deal jackets. ParaScript offers mortgage document classification, and its site highlights handwriting.
Teams already on UiPath can use UiPath IXP. UiPath's pre-trained extraction models include bank statements, checks, pay slips, W-2s and the 1040. Its list has no 1099, so test your 1099s before you rely on it.
Engineering teams on a tight budget pay the least per page with a cloud classifier or an LLM document API. Azure's custom classifier costs $3 per 1,000 pages. Azure's prebuilt models for US bank statements, pay stubs, checks, mortgage forms and tax forms cost $10 per 1,000 pages. The classifier labels each document and can split the file. Your code then sends each one to the right model. Google's custom classifier costs $5 per 1,000 pages. Its bank statement parser, which reads the data on a statement, costs $0.75 per document, not per page. Google's W2 parser lists only the 2018, 2019 and 2020 versions of the form. Google discontinued its lending splitter, which split loan files, on June 30, 2026.
AWS's Analyze Lending splits a loan package and labels each page with one of 35 types, or as UNCLASSIFIED. Its types include the 1003, the W-2, pay slips and bank statements. It costs $0.07 a page. In AWS's own pricing example, only the pages of supported types are billed.
With all three clouds, your engineers build the review screen and the connection to your loan system. Our guide to Textract, Azure and Google Document AI for classification compares the three. Fintech teams that build their own system can also send documents to Reducto or LlamaParse through their APIs. Both classify from a short description of each type, and LlamaParse's Classify costs $1.25 per 1,000 pages in its fast mode. Docsumo prices its plans on request, and its review queue is part of the platform.
Test any vendor's accuracy figure, ours included, on a month of your own loan files, and score it by document type. For bank statements alone, see our list of the best bank statement extraction software.
Classification for financial compliance
Compliance teams ask a different question of a classifier. They need to show what happened to each document, and who saw it. Check these points before you automate classification in a regulated workflow.
- Every document in the file is accounted forThe tool should list each document it found, so a missing one stands out, such as the second month of statements.
- Every label has a confidence scoreUncertain documents should go to a person with the reason, not into a folder under the tool's best guess.
- Label changes are loggedKeep a record of each label a reviewer changed, and who changed it, for your next audit.
- Access is set by roleStaff should see only the documents their job needs. Account numbers and SSNs should be redacted where nobody needs them.
- Data stays where your policy saysCheck the hosting regions on offer, or whether the tool runs on your own servers.
- Document type isn't data classificationLabels such as confidential come from data classification software. So do retention periods, which set how long to keep each file. Ask whether your policy means data classification or document type.
Docsumo runs in the cloud only, and you choose the region where your data is hosted, such as the US, the EU or the UK. It's SOC 2 Type 2 audited and ISO 27001 certified, with role-based access, single sign-on and multi-factor authentication. It finds and redacts sensitive data such as SSNs and account numbers. Audit logging comes with the Business plan, and your documents aren't used to train shared or third-party models. The details are on our security page.
If your policy keeps customer files on your own servers, ABBYY Vantage, Hyperscience, Tungsten TotalAgility, Grooper and Doxis can run there. Reducto can too, on its Enterprise plan, which also offers a VPC, a private network in the cloud. Reducto has completed SOC 2 Type 2. Hyperscience's cloud service is authorized at the FedRAMP High level, for US government work. LlamaParse and Reducto return the reasoning behind each label, which helps when an auditor asks why a document was filed where it was. For compliance checks beyond classification, see our guide to document compliance automation.
Insurance claims and submissions
Insurance teams classify two kinds of mail. Underwriting gets broker emails with an application, supplements, loss runs and a schedule of values attached. Claims teams start with a first notice of loss. It can arrive on an ACORD loss notice, such as the ACORD 1 for property or the ACORD 2 for auto. Police reports, repair estimates, medical bills and photos follow. They may all come in one PDF, or arrive one email at a time over several weeks.
Each document needs a label before anyone can read it, because an estimate and a police report need different fields. To scale data entry, classify each document as it arrives and send each type to its own queue. Pages the classifier can't place should wait for a person, not go to the closest guess.
Docsumo splits a submission or claim PDF into its documents and labels each one. It classifies documents with 99% accuracy. You name the types you need, such as ACORD 125, loss run or repair estimate, and it sorts files into them with no training set. Splitting and classification come with the Business plan. Pages it can't place wait as Unclassified for a person to assign. On the Enterprise plan, Case Routing files a document that arrives later into the open claim by its claim number. Also on the Enterprise plan, Docsumo checks the loss runs against the losses reported on the ACORD 125. It works with Guidewire, Duck Creek and Applied Epic through the API and webhooks, and any other system with an API connects the same way. See Docsumo for insurance.
Insurers that must run software on their own servers can look at ABBYY Vantage and Hyperscience. ABBYY's pre-trained classifier covers the ACORD 2 auto loss notice and the ACORD 25 and 125. Hyperscience says its pre-trained models cover ACORD forms, and its insurance page lists claim forms and policy applications. Doxis says it automates claims intake, classification and routing from the first notice of loss to settlement. Insurance teams that already use UiPath can start from its pre-trained extraction models. They cover the ACORD 25 certificate and the ACORD 125, 126, 131 and 140 application forms. ParaScript says it identifies and separates each document type in a single PDF submission. Engineering teams at insurance technology companies can build on a cloud classifier, or send documents to Reducto or LlamaParse through their APIs. Either way, they add their own review step.
Our insurance OCR guide compares insurance tools side by side, including Indico Data and Affinda, which aren't in this list. For the steps after the label, see our guides to FNOL automation and insurance submission intake. Our list of claims data extraction tools compares eight tools on loss notices, estimates and medical bills.
Healthcare back offices
Healthcare back offices get claim forms, EOBs, referrals and records, often faxed as one long file. Docsumo for healthcare splits and reads them, and it signs a BAA with customers who process protected health information. To sort and index medical records, see our list of healthcare document classification software, which compares 14 tools. Our list of healthcare data extraction software compares 13 tools for these documents. If your volume is mostly scanned mail rather than case files, our guide to the digital mailroom covers intake and routing.
Classify only, or classify and extract?
Pick by what happens after the label. Some documents only need to reach the right folder or person, as in a mailroom or an archive. For those, a capture tool such as Grooper or ParaScript can be enough, or the classifier on your own cloud. Other documents have data that must be read and checked before anyone decides. For those, choose a platform that classifies and extracts in one place. If it has to run on your own servers, look at ABBYY Vantage, Hyperscience or Tungsten TotalAgility. Engineers building their own pipeline can start with Reducto, LlamaParse or their cloud's classifier.
If your team processes loan, claim or healthcare files and wants only the uncertain fields in front of its reviewers, that's where Docsumo fits. For extraction tools, see our comparison of IDP software. For how classifiers work, see our guide to document classification.
Book a demo and bring one of your messiest mixed files, or start a free trial to test extraction on your own documents.
Frequently asked questions
What is document classification software?
It's software that works out what each incoming document is, such as an invoice or a claim form. It also splits files that hold several documents. Then each document can be routed and have its data extracted. Most tools also score their confidence, so uncertain documents can go to a person.
What is the best document classification software?
It depends on who will run it. Operations teams that process loan, claim or healthcare files usually want one platform that classifies and extracts. Docsumo, ABBYY Vantage and Hyperscience are examples. Engineers building their own pipeline can start with their cloud's classifier from Google, Microsoft or AWS, or an API such as Reducto or LlamaParse.
Which document classification software works for insurance claim processing?
Pick a tool that splits a claim packet, such as a loss notice, police report and estimates in one PDF, and labels each document. Docsumo, ABBYY Vantage and Hyperscience classify and extract in one platform. Docsumo holds pages it can't place as Unclassified, so a person assigns them instead of the tool guessing. On the Enterprise plan, it also files documents that arrive later into the open claim by its claim number.
Which document classification tools suit banks, lenders and other financial firms?
Lenders need a tool that splits a loan file into bank statements, pay stubs, W-2s, tax returns and IDs. Docsumo does this on the Business plan, and on the Enterprise plan it also checks the documents against each other. Ocrolus says it handles more than 2,100 document types, and AWS's Analyze Lending labels 35 loan document types. Banks that must keep files on their own servers can look at ABBYY Vantage, Hyperscience or Tungsten TotalAgility.
Which document classification tools fit a lending team on a tight budget?
Per page, classification alone costs least with an LLM document API or a cloud classifier. LlamaParse's Classify costs $1.25 per 1,000 pages in its fast mode. Azure's custom classifier costs $3 per 1,000 pages, and Google's costs $5 per 1,000 pages. AWS's Analyze Lending costs more, at $0.07 a page, but it also extracts the data. With each of these, your engineers build the review step and the connection to your loan system. Docsumo prices its plans on request, and its review queue is part of the platform.
What should you check before automating document classification for financial compliance?
Check that every label has a confidence score and that uncertain documents go to a person. Then check that label changes are logged, that access is set by role and that data is hosted where your policy requires. Docsumo is SOC 2 Type 2 audited and ISO 27001 certified, and it runs in the cloud only. ABBYY Vantage, Hyperscience, Tungsten TotalAgility, Grooper and Doxis can run on your own servers.
What is the most scalable platform for classifying many document types?
Check how each tool adds a new type and what it does with pages that fit no type. Docsumo, Google's custom classifier, Reducto and LlamaParse add a type from its name or description, with no training set. Trained classifiers need samples for every new type, from 5 per type in UiPath to 10 or more pages per layout in Hyperscience.
What is a simple tool for classifying business documents automatically?
For documents that only need to reach the right folder, a cloud classifier or an API such as LlamaParse is the simplest start. You build the review step yourself. When the data in each document must also be read and checked, Docsumo classifies and extracts in one place, with no training set.
Can LLMs be used for document classification?
Yes. Several tools now classify with a large language model that reads each type's name and description, so you don't need a labeled training set. Docsumo, Google's custom classifier, Reducto, LlamaParse and Grooper's LLM Classifier work this way. Test them on look-alike document types, and keep a confidence threshold that sends uncertain pages to a person.
Is document classification the same as data classification?
No. Data classification labels files as public, confidential and so on. Security teams use those labels to decide who can open a file and how long to keep it. Document classification, as covered here, sorts documents by type so each one can be read and routed.
How much does document classification software cost?
Most cloud and API classifiers charge per page. Per 1,000 pages, LlamaParse's Classify costs $1.25 in its fast mode and Azure's custom classifier costs $3. Google's custom classifier costs $5 for the first million pages a month, and Reducto's Classify costs $7.50. Most IDP platforms, Docsumo included, price their plans on request. Add the time your team spends fixing misfiled documents.
How accurate is AI document classification?
Vendors publish figures measured on their own documents, so they don't transfer to yours. Docsumo classifies documents with 99% accuracy, and that figure needs the same test. Run a month of your own files through each tool. Then measure accuracy for each document type. An overall average can hide one type the tool keeps confusing with another.
Sources
- Docsumo: pricing
- Docsumo: AI document classification
- Docsumo: security
- ABBYY: document classification and splitting
- ABBYY: Vantage
- ABBYY: train a classifier (training set size)
- ABBYY: Vantage trial
- ABBYY: Vantage Classifier (docs)
- ABBYY: Assemble activity (docs)
- ABBYY: Invoice Splitter skill (docs)
- ABBYY: Purchase Order Splitter skill (docs)
- ABBYY: Brokerage Statement Splitter skill (docs)
- ABBYY: Manual Review activity (docs)
- ABBYY: banking and financial services
- Hyperscience: Hypercell platform
- Hyperscience: semi-structured document classification (help center)
- Hyperscience: training a classification model (help center)
- Hyperscience: automatically organize large file submissions (Auto-Splitting)
- Hyperscience: financial services
- Hyperscience: insurance
- Hyperscience: security (FedRAMP High)
- Tungsten Automation: TotalAgility
- Tungsten Automation: TotalAgility release highlights
- Tungsten Automation: TotalAgility 2026.1 (March 5, 2026)
- Tungsten Automation: TotalAgility Features Guide 2026.2 (PDF)
- Tungsten Automation: classification in DocAI Studio (help)
- Tungsten Automation: about (formerly Kofax)
- UiPath: IXP
- UiPath: pricing
- UiPath: trainable splitter (docs)
- UiPath: classify documents automatically (docs)
- UiPath: Document Understanding migration to IXP (docs)
- UiPath: train a classifier (docs)
- UiPath: generative classifier (docs)
- UiPath: metering and charging logic (docs)
- UiPath: pre-trained document types (docs)
- Doxis: document classification
- Doxis: Doxis AI.dp
- Klippa: Klippa is now Doxis
- Doxis: SER Group rebrands to Doxis (January 19, 2026)
- Doxis AI.dp: split endpoint (docs)
- Doxis: banking and financial services
- Doxis: insurance
- Grooper: document classification
- Grooper: LLM Classifier (wiki)
- Grooper: AI Separate (wiki)
- Grooper: classify methods (wiki)
- Grooper: Grooper and AI (wiki)
- Grooper: IDP vendors 2026 (deployment and licensing)
- Grooper: automated loan processing (April 28, 2026)
- ParaScript: document classification software
- ParaScript: FormXtra.AI
- ParaScript: FormXtra.AI SDK
- ParaScript: FormXtra.AI Capture
- ParaScript: FormXtra.AI 8.0 (February 16, 2021)
- ParaScript: FormXtra.AI 8.4 (January 30, 2023)
- ParaScript: Stakk completes acquisition of ParaScript (September 24, 2026)
- ParaScript: mortgage document automation
- ParaScript: healthcare and insurance
- Rossum: pricing
- Rossum: Aurora
- Rossum: splitting documents (knowledge base)
- Rossum: document sorting extension (knowledge base)
- Rossum: Coupa acquires Rossum (May 12, 2026)
- Google Cloud: Document AI custom classifier
- Google Cloud: Document AI custom splitter
- Google Cloud: Document AI processor list
- Google Cloud: Document AI release notes
- Google Cloud: Document AI deprecations
- Google Cloud: Document AI pricing
- Microsoft: Document Intelligence custom classification model
- Microsoft: Document Intelligence pricing
- Microsoft: Document Intelligence in Foundry Tools
- Microsoft: Content Understanding classification
- Microsoft: Document Intelligence models (docs)
- Microsoft: bank statement model (docs)
- AWS: Textract Analyze Lending (docs)
- AWS: Analyze Lending document types (docs)
- AWS: Amazon Textract pricing
- AWS: Amazon Bedrock Data Automation
- AWS: Bedrock Data Automation document splitting (docs)
- AWS: Bedrock Data Automation projects (docs)
- AWS: Amazon Bedrock pricing
- AWS: Amazon Comprehend custom classification (docs)
- AWS: Amazon A2I human review loops (no longer open to new customers)
- Reducto: pricing
- Reducto: Classify (docs)
- Reducto: Split (docs)
- Reducto: credit usage (docs)
- Reducto: security policies (docs)
- LlamaIndex: LlamaParse pricing
- LlamaIndex: Classify (docs)
- LlamaIndex: Split (docs)
- LlamaIndex: newsletter, LlamaCloud renamed LlamaParse (February 24, 2026)
- Ocrolus: Classify (docs)
- Ocrolus: mortgage
- Ocrolus: homepage (platform for lenders)
- Ocrolus: FAQ (document types)
- Ocrolus: platform (human-in-the-loop)
- Ocrolus: Encompass integration (docs)
- Ocrolus: Classify in Encompass (docs)
- Ocrolus: MeridianLink integration (docs)
- ACORD: forms index (loss notices)
First published . Last updated .