Top 5 Mistral AI Alternatives in 2025

Top Mistral Competitors Ranked
Docsumo Document AI vs Mistral AI
- Ease of use: Mistral AI operates as an API-only solution requiring technical integration, while Docsumo provides intuitive Excel-like data tables and user-friendly interfaces for business users.
- Processing complexity: Mistral AI excels at complex document understanding with mathematical expressions and multilingual content, whereas Docsumo focuses on structured data extraction with customizable validation rules.
- Pricing: Mistral AI offers competitive pricing at $1 per 1,000 pages, while Docsumo's Growth plan starts at $0.3 per page with a free trial of 100 pages monthly.
- Processing accuracy: Mistral AI achieves 91% overall accuracy with superior mathematical content processing, but Docsumo delivers 95-99% accuracy with touchless processing capabilities.
- Integration: Mistral AI provides API-based integrations requiring developer expertise, while Docsumo enables seamless integration via APIs, emails, cloud drives, and direct uploads.
Verdict -
Mistral AI is best for organizations needing superior OCR accuracy and technical flexibility, while Docsumo suits businesses requiring complete workflow management with user-friendly interfaces.
Google Document AI vs Mistral AI
- Ease of use: Mistral AI requires custom interface development through APIs, whereas Google Document AI provides pre-built processors and Document AI Workbench for model customization.
- AI-model configuration: Mistral AI offers a single pre-trained model without customization options, while Google Document AI supports custom model training and enhancement of existing processors.
- Pricing: Mistral AI costs $1 per 1,000 pages with batch processing efficiency, but Google Document AI starts at $1.50 per 1,000 pages for basic OCR.
- Processing accuracy: Mistral AI significantly outperforms with 94.89% overall accuracy, while Google Document AI achieves 83.42% with limited multilingual support.
- Integration: Mistral AI focuses on API-first approach for technical teams, whereas Google Document AI integrates seamlessly within Google Cloud ecosystem and enterprise workflows.
Verdict -
Mistral AI is ideal for organizations prioritizing accuracy and processing speed, while Google Document AI suits enterprises already invested in Google Cloud infrastructure.
Amazon Textract vs Mistral AI
- Ease of use: Mistral AI operates through API endpoints without native UI, while Amazon Textract provides AWS console integration with visual document analysis tools.
- Processing complexity: Mistral AI preserves complex document structures and mathematical expressions, whereas Amazon Textract excels at form field extraction and table data recognition.
- Pricing: Mistral AI offers transparent pricing at $1 per 1,000 pages, but Amazon Textract follows pay-as-you-go model starting from $1.50 per 1,000 pages.
- Processing accuracy: Mistral AI achieves 94.89% overall accuracy with superior multilingual support, while Amazon Textract reaches 93% accuracy with strong table processing capabilities.
- Integration: Mistral AI requires custom development for enterprise integration, whereas Amazon Textract integrates natively with AWS services and enterprise applications.
Verdict -
Mistral AI is best for organizations needing advanced document understanding and multilingual processing, while Amazon Textract suits AWS-centric enterprises requiring form processing automation.
Landing AI vs Mistral AI
- Ease of use: Mistral AI provides API-only access requiring technical implementation, while Landing AI offers visual debugging tools and structured JSON output interfaces.
- Processing complexity: Mistral AI processes up to 2,000 pages per minute with high accuracy, whereas Landing AI focuses on agentic extraction but processes only 1-2 minutes per page.
- Pricing: Mistral AI offers competitive transparent pricing at $1 per 1,000 pages, while Landing AI follows tiered pricing requiring custom consultation for enterprise features.
- Processing accuracy: Mistral AI achieves 94.89% overall accuracy with consistent performance, but Landing AI delivers 78.6% accuracy with tendency to paraphrase content.
- Integration: Mistral AI supports standard API integrations for developers, whereas Landing AI provides Snowflake integration with vector similarity search capabilities.
Verdict -
Mistral AI is ideal for high-volume, accurate document processing requirements, while Landing AI suits organizations needing specialized visual grounding and Snowflake integration.
Ocrolus vs Mistral AI
- Ease of use: Mistral AI requires custom interface development through APIs, while Ocrolus provides specialized financial document processing interfaces with human-in-the-loop validation.
- Processing complexity: Mistral AI handles diverse document types with multilingual support, whereas Ocrolus specializes exclusively in financial document processing with fraud detection capabilities.
- Pricing: Mistral AI offers transparent pricing at $1 per 1,000 pages, but Ocrolus follows custom pricing based on specific business requirements and document volumes.
- Processing accuracy: Mistral AI achieves 94.89% overall accuracy across document types, while Ocrolus delivers 99%+ accuracy specifically for financial documents with human validation.
- Integration: Mistral AI provides flexible API-based integrations for various industries, whereas Ocrolus offers specialized financial services integrations with comprehensive audit trails.
Verdict -
Mistral AI is best for organizations needing versatile, high-accuracy document processing across industries, while Ocrolus suits financial services requiring specialized processing with human validation and fraud detection.
“Docsumo is the best” - That's what they said
Five Reasons To Choose Docsumo Over Mistral AI
Ready-to-rock models - Skip the setup sprint

Bullseye accuracy that always wows

Train your AI sidekick in minutes

Interface that moulds as per your needs

Automation that’s actually automatic - Set it and forget it

Fill up the form to speak with an automation expert.
